Mistakes piled onto half-truths and outright lies: Iraq undermined liberal intervention

Issue 1019 - 15 Jul 2016
Whether President Barack Obama should have carried through on his threat to intervene in Syria when evidence of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) were revealed in 2013, or if Western allies should have been more robust in projecting their interests in building a post-Qadhafi state in Libya, remain live issues today. The fact that neither happened can be traced directly to the catalogue of disasters that began with the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003; an ignominious chapter of recent western history which has now been elegantly and intensively recorded in Sir John Chilcot’s Report of the Iraq Inquiry, which covers the UK’s involvement from mid-2001 until its troops formally withdrew in July 2009.

Want to read more?

Subscribe to Gulf States Newsletter

View subscription options

This article is available to registered users


Don't have an account?

Register for access to our free content

An account also allows you to view selected free articles and set up news alerts.


Want to see more articles like this?

Search our archive or set up custom notifications to be alerted about new content.

Contact us

Jon Marks
Editorial director

Dominic Dudley

Harry Randle Marsh
Subscriptions and sales

Tel: +44 (0)1424 721667

Have you created a free account?

Sign up for an account to set up news alerts and get free access to our historic archive (1979-2003), articles under 100 words, Gulf States Newsletter View articles and a selection of other samples.

View a selection of Free articles