Syria debate should not hinge on sending a ‘message to Iran’

Issue 954 - 20 Sep 2013
One of the more bizarre arguments put forward by the Obama administration as it pushed for military intervention in Syria was that failing to respond to the horrific chemical attack on Ghouta would send the wrong ‘message’ to Iran. On 3 September, secretary of state John Kerry mentioned Iran four times in his brief opening statement to members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, as he sought to convince them of the need to strike. “Iran is hoping you look the other way,” Kerry said. “Our inaction would surely give them a permission slip for them to at least misinterpret our intention if not to put it to the test.” Defence secretary Chuck Hagel took a similar tone. “Our refusal to act would undermine the credibility of America’s other security commitments, including the president’s commitment to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon,” he said.

Want to read more?

Subscribe to Gulf States Newsletter

View subscription options

This article is available to registered users


Don't have an account?

Register for access to our free content

An account also allows you to view selected free articles and set up news alerts.


Want to see more articles like this?

Search our archive or set up custom notifications to be alerted about new content.

Contact us

Jon Marks
Editorial director

Dominic Dudley

Harry Randle Marsh
Subscriptions and sales

Tel: +44 (0)1424 721667

Have you created a free account?

Sign up for an account to set up news alerts and get free access to our historic archive (1979-2003), articles under 100 words, Gulf States Newsletter View articles and a selection of other samples.

View a selection of Free articles